Lecture Topic: Mating Systems
Definitions
Pair bond: association that is at least moderately long term between
male and female
Monogamy: 1 male pair bonds with 1 female
-
may be long term, over many seasons (e.g. swans, geese) or just for one
breeding attempt (most species)
-
monogamy is the most common mating system in birds; occurs in most bird
species
-
in other animal groups, monogamy is much less common than other mating
systems
Polygyny: 1 male pair bonds with >1 female
-
next most common mating system in birds after polygyny, but much less common
than monogamy
-
in other animal groups polygyny often the most common mating system
Polyandry: 1 female pair bonds with >1 male
-
less common than monogamy or polygyny in birds
-
more common in birds than in other animal groups
-
a number of examples in the Charadriiformes
Polygynandry: >1 male and >1 female form pair bonds (many ratites, tinamous;
dunnocks)
Promiscuity: >1 male mates with >1 female: little/no pair bond
Are mating systems species typical?
-
some species: virtually all show the same mating system (ex: monogamous
gulls, polygynous red-winged blackbirds)
-
some species: different individuals have different mating systems (ex:
indigo buntings: most monogamous, 15-20% polygynous; dunnocks: many different
possible mating systems for different individuals.)
Hypotheses to explain why monogamy is so common in birds:
-
young birds energetically costly to raise; requires both parents.
Support: in some altricial species, if remove one parent, decrease survival
of young. Not supported for some monogamous precocial species: removal
of males does not affect survival of young
-
both parents required to successfully raise young for some reason other
than the energy cost of raising young. Ex: many seabirds: if one parent
removed, young lost to predation.
-
male-male and female-female interactions limit possibility of being polygynous
or polyandrous. Support: Willow Ptarmigan (Galliformes): females defend
larger territories from other females; males cannot successfully defend
areas large enough to hold more than one female from other males. "Spaced-out
female effect."
Hypotheses to explain the occurrance of polygyny
-
high "environmental potential for polygyny"; female spacing patterns
may make it easier for a male to defend >1 female. Ex: nest predation may
favor female clumping in favorable, predator free areas. A male can
more easily defend several clumped females than several spaced out females.
-
the polygyny threshold model: in patchy habitats, late-arriving females
may benefit by mating with an already mated male on a high quality territory
(polygyny) than by mating with an umated male on a low quality territory
(monogamy) if even by sharing resources with another female on the high
quality territory she will get more resources than she would in the low
quality territory.
One of the hypotheses for polyandry:
-
many polyandrous birds are in the Charadriiformes, birds with a small
number of precocial young per clutch (e.g. jacanas, spotted sandpipers,
phalaropes)
-
double clutching evolves first: female lays eggs in a nest for a male,
then lays another set of eggs in nest that she incubates. This would
evolve because it increases the reproductive success of male and female.
Only one parent needed to raise young.
-
once the male has evolved the behavior of doing all parental care at one
nest, the female can maximize her reproductive success if she mates with
more than one male and having each male take care of one nest. Polyandry
thus evolves after double-clutching
Extra-pair copulations: the genetic mating system may be different
from the social mating system because birds mate with individuals to which
they are not pair bonded.
Examples:
-
forced extra-pair copulations: ducks
-
indigo buntings: young males sire fewer young
-
white-crowned sparrows: old males sire fewer young
-
red-winged blackbirds: males with many females on their territories sire
more young on & off territories