Lecture Topic: Avian Systematics
Introduction to Systematics:
-
phylogeny: evolutionary relationships among species
-
systematics: study of evolutionary relationships (phylogeny) and of species
identity
-
studied based on characteristics
-
homology: characteristics in common because of common ancestry; show relationships
-
convergent evolution: characters in common because have independently evolved;
do not show relationships (a problem for studies of systematics.)
-
rates of evolution: if variable, characters can be misleading, especially
if based on a measure of overall how similar species are
Characteristics of birds used in systematics:
Morphological traits such as:
-
palate type; skeletal structure; syringeal structure; limb muscles
Behavioral traits such as:
-
vocalizations; courtship displays; nest structure
Molecular traits:
-
DNA-DNA hybridization : used by Sibley & Ahlquist to derive phylogeny
of bird orders, families, some species.
-
hybridize single DNA strands from two different species
-
determine temperature at which 50% of the DNA forms stable hybrids this
temperature is proportional to the similarity of the DNA strands
-
DNA-DNA hybridization examines overall similarity of DNA between species
so it will give an accurate estimate of phylogeny only if evolutionary
rates are on average constant
-
DNA sequencing
-
mitochondrial DNA (non-coding: species, subspecies; protein coding: genera,
families
-
nuclear DNA (various levels)
-
ribosomal DNA/RNA (early divergences among avian groups)
Pros and cons of various morphological, behavioral and molecular traits:
How much of the genome is used
-
DNA-DNA hybridization: all of genome used
-
other traits (DNA sequence or behavior or morphology): traits reflect only
a small part of the genome
How much traits are subject to convergence
-
DNA-DNA hybridization: unknown.
-
DNA sequence, behavior, morphology: since use discrete characteristics,
can calculate statistics to evaluate the level of convergence; have more
confidence in tree if convergence is low
Dependence on assumption of uniform average rate of DNA evolution
-
DNA-DNA hybridization: strongest dependence on uniform average rate of
DNA evolution
Evaluation of the assumption of a "uniform average rate" of DNA evolution.
-
Different studies where pair-wise comparisons have been done for DNA-DNA
hybridization differ in whether condition met:
-
Sibley and Ahlquist's ratite data: condition is met
-
Houde's results: for two groups (old world warbler species, thrush species)
for which data available, condition is NOT met
Some proposed relationships among avian orders:
Relative well-supported relationships (supported by more than one kind
of data):
-
Paleognathae (ratites and timamous) vs. Neognathae (all other birds):
Supported by palate structure and DNA-DNA hybridization
-
Close relationship between Anseriformes and Galliformes: supported by DNA-DNA
hybridization and some morphological characters
-
Close relationship between Gruiformes and Charadriiformes suggested by
DNA-DNA hybridization and hind-limb muscles; both these methods suggest
that some groups currently placed in the Gruiformes may belong in the Charadriiformes
-
Close relationship between Apodiformes and Passeriformes supported by DNA-DNA
hybridization and hind-limb muscles. The Apodiformes (swifts and hummingbirds)
may belong together as suggested by the classification, or one or the other
might be more closely related to the Passeriformes
Some groups whose phylogenetic relationships are unclear:
-
Strigiformes. DNA-DNA hybridization places them with Caprimulgiformes;
hind-limb muscles and some other morphological traits place them with Falconiformes.
-
Phoenicopteriformes. DNA-DNA hybridization and some leg muscle data
place them with Ciconiiformes; other leg muscle data and skeletal characters
place them with Charadriiformes
-
Some other orders (ex: Columbiformes, Psittaciformes) each have so many
of their own unique characteristics that finding traits that link them
to other groups has been difficult; their relationships to other groups
are thus not known
Relationships within the Passeriformes:
Suboscines: worldwide group; New World Flycatchers, manakins, cotingas,
woodcreepers, antbirds, pittas, ovenbirds, and allie. Share characteristics
of syrinx; simpler song than oscines
Oscines: worldwide group; unique complex syrinx; often have complex,
learned song. Main oscine groups (based on DNA-DNA hybridization;
some also confirmed by hind-limb muscles and some other morphological characters):
-
crow relatives: crows, jays, Old World orioles, drongos, shrikes, vireos,
numerous Australasian groups. Crows & jays worldwide; others
primarily old world.
-
thrush relatives: thrushes, waxwings, dippers, starlings, mockingbirds,
old world warblers, old world flycatchers. Worldwide group.
-
Old World insecteaters: worldwide group (probably originated in the Old
World then spread); nuthatches, creepers, wrens, babblers, chickadees,
swallows, etc.
-
Weaver relatives: worldwide with most diversity in old world. Larks, old
world sparrows, accentors, weavers, sunbirds, etc.
-
Nine-primaried oscines: primarily new world group, some members in old
world, none in Australasia. New world warblers, new world sparrows,
buntings, cardinals, finches, blackbirds & allies.