The Scientific Method and Evidence for Evolution
NOTE: These are lecture notes for Biology
391, Organic Evolution, at The University
of Tennesee at Martin. Anyone outside of UT Martin wishing to
use these notes or to contact me for additional information should first
read
the
information obtained by clicking here.
Goals: Review the scientific method, especially as it is applied
to evolutionary biology, then discuss the evidence for the main theory
of evolution, that all life has evolved from pre-existing life and ultimately
from a species that was the ancestor to all life on earth.
Related Textbook Material: Freeman and Herron (2001) Chapters
2 and 8
Lab Manual Questions over this material are in Lab
Manual Chapter X
The Lecture:
Evolutionary biology, like all science, is based on the scientific method.
The basic process of the scientific method is as follows:
-
Based on observations about the natural world, we ask questions
about
the natural world
-
We develop hypotheses: possible explanations for the phenomena we
observe in the natural world (possible answers to our questions) that can
be tested based on observations and/or experiments and that are consistent
with what is already known about these phenomena.
-
We develop predictions: observations and/or experimental results
that we expect to see if the hypothesis is true.
-
If the predictions are NOT met, we conclude that the hypothesis is false,
since if it were true we would have observed what was predicted.
-
If the predictions ARE met, we conclude that the hypothesis might be true;
it is supported, but we can NOT conclude that it is true, because there
might always be another hypothesis that would predict the same things.
-
If a hypothesis is supported, we consider other hypothesis that make the
same predictions, and develop new predictions of each hypothesis that are
NOT made by the other hypotheses. We test these, and can rule out
more hypotheses, thereby providing better support for a hypothesis that
is still supported.
-
If a hypothesis is a general explanation (explains many different things)
and has been tested and re-tested many times and found to be very generally
supported by all these tests so that it becomes extremely unlikely that
it false, it is called a theory. So, scientifically, a theory is
a general explanation that is extremely well supported (very likely to
be true.)
There are two kinds of hypothesis in biology:
Proximate hypotheses are explanations of how things work
or develop
Ultimate hypotheses are explanations of why things are
the way they are
Evolutionary biologists address primarily ultimate explanations; we
want to know why the traits we see in organisms have evolved.
Look over the basic outline of the scientific method, then click
here to go through an example of a scientific study of an evolutionary
question, to see how the scientific method can be applied to evolutionary
biology. At this point you should also read Chapter 3, Section 3.1, in
your textbook, to see how Greene and Shutler applied the scientific method
to test evolutionary hypotheses. Once you have finished reading these examples,
you should test your knowledge by trying to answer questions 1 and 2 in
chapter III of your lab manual.
The Evidence for Evolution
Now that we've considered the scientific method generally, and seen some
examples of how it is applied, let's consider the general evidence for
the theory of evolution. Note that the word "theory" here is used in the
scientific sense -- it means that the hypothesis of evolution has been
tested and supported many times, and is a general explanation that is extremely
likely to be true. Note that in the paper you are reading by Gould, one
thing argued by Pope John Paul, is that evolution is most likely fact because
supported by evidence from a variety of disciplines. This is what makes
it a scientific theory. So let's look at some of the lines of evidence
for the theory of evolution.
-
There is evidence that process can occur; it has been observed occurring
within populations. You have seen examples of this in the peppered moth
and HIV.
-
Just showing that evolution can occur within a species doesn't necessarily
mean that it can result in such large change that whole new species can
be created. There are several lines of evidence that new species can, and
have, formed:
-
Species called ring species exist. A ring species is a species with
a circular geographic distribution (a distribution around something) in
which individuals from neigboring populations can reproduce with each other
EXCEPT at ONE point. An example is in Ensatina salamanders, shown here:
These salamanders live around the edges of the central valley of California.
They vary in color from place to place, as shown. At most areas where different
color forms meet, they reproduce with each other. However, at the bottom
of the ring (indicated by the red arrow) where the yellow spotted form
on the right meets the brown form that is red-orange underneath on the
left, the two forms do not reproduce with each other.
The fact that ring species such as this exist suggests that evolutionary
change within populations (presumably what created the color differences
between salamander populations) can accumulate to the point where some
different populations are as different as are different species -- they
can no longer reproduce with each other. The fact that most CAN reproduce
suggests that this is all one species, but the populations that can NOT
reproduce with each other are as different as two different species.
-
Another line of evidence that species have evolved from other species is
the existence of homology: similarity among species that is apparently
inherited from a common ancestor. So, for example, vertebrates that dwell
on land have very similar limb structure with a single large upper limb
bone, two lower limb bones, and five fingers. This similarity suggests
that all these species evolved from a common ancestor which had this limb
structure; the reason all these species have this structure is that their
ancestor did. Examples of homology occur throughout all life. Some important
points about homology include:
-
the pattern of homology is hierarchical -- that is, larger groups
of organisms that share some common (homologous) feature can be divided
into smaller groups that share more and more features in common. For example,
all vertebrates have a vertebral column. This large group includes the
smaller group of land-dwelling vertebrates which have a vertebral column
AND the common limb structure described above. This group includes the
still smaller group of the mammals, which have a vertebral column, common
limb structure, AND have fur (hair) and mammary glands. Thus, the pattern
of homology is not random. This provides evidence that mammals came from
a distant ancestor that was also the ancestor to the rest of the vertebrates
and had a vertebral column (that's why all vertebrates have the vertebral
column -- they inherited it from that ancestor), and more recently within
that group came from an ancestor to all the land-dwelling vertebrates,
which evolved the limb structure, and then still more recently came from
a common ancestor to all mammals which evolved fur and mammary glands.
This hierarchical pattern is thus exactly what is predicted if species
evolve, through speciation, from pre-existing species.
-
similarity of characters among species is particularly good evidence for
evolution if other hypotheses that could explain the similarity can be
ruled out. A main alternate hypothesis for similarity is that the
structures are required for similar function. Similarities in structures
that are modified to be used for different functions, or similarities existing
for no functional reason, are thus strong evidence for evolution.
For example, the five-toed limb of land vertebrates does not have an apparent
functional reason and occurs in species that use their limbs in very different
ways (bats use it to support wings, monkeys use it to climb, salamanders
to walk.) Thus, common function can be ruled out as a possible explanation
for the similarity. More examples of this are given below.
-
some homology exists in the form of vestigial organs -- structures
that resemble structures of other species but are much reduced in size
and may have little or no apparent function. For example, some snakes have
tiny bones that resemble leg and pelvic girdle bones of other reptiles.
Since snakes do not have legs, these are apparently functionless. The fact
that they exist suggests that snakes evolved from a common ancestor with
other reptiles, an ancestor that had legs.
-
some homology is common to all life and provides evidence that all living
things came from a common ancestor. An important example of this is the
universality of almost all of the genetic code. Remember that the genetic
code is the system of three base sequences in DNA and RNA such that each
three letter sequence codes for a specific amino acid in the protein that
is made based on the information in DNA and RNA. With a couple of minor
exceptions, every organisms has the same code. Since there is apparently
no chemical reason that the code has to be what it is, the near universality
of the code provides evidence that all species evolved from a common ancestor,
which had this genetic code.
-
The evidence noted above all comes from comparing currently living species.
A large body of evidence for evolution comes from fossils -- the fossil
record shows many cases in which, through time, forms occur that have apparently
changed slightly from previous forms and which then apparently change into
other forms.
At this point, you should check your understanding of the evidence for
evolution by answering questions 4-9 in Chapter III of your lab manual.
Study Tips:
-
be careful when discussing hypotheses that you remember that it is IMPOSSIBLE
to prove any hypothesis. Be sure not to state or imply that this
is possible.
-
test your understanding of the scientific method by stating the hypotheses
being tested, predictions, and evidence, relevant to all the evidence for
evolution described above.
Return to the index of
lectures