V.
GENETIC DRIFT, GENE FLOW, AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH NATURAL SELECTION
(See
Freeman and Herron (2001) Chapter 6 and the lecture notes on genetic
drift and gene flow and on local adaptation
and chi-square tests)
Terms to know: gene flow, genetic drift, local adaptation, population
bottleneck (bottleneck effect), genetic (heritable) variation, Hardy-Weinberg
Proportions (as distinct from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium), inbreeding,
identity by descent
Questions:
-
Describe two forms of evolution that could result in an allele with adverse
(harmful) effects on survival and reproduction becoming more common in
a population; explain why each would have this effect.
-
What effect does genetic drift have on: (a) genetic variation (b) genotype
frequencies (are they in Hardy-Weinberg proportions or not? Do they change
from generation to generation?). Why does genetic drift has these effects?
-
Give examples of how molecular studies which directly examine allele and
frequencies through identification of the DNA that makes up genes or the
proteins for which the genes encode information could be used to study
each of the following: natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow.
-
Read about Buri's (1956) experiments on random fixation and loss of heterozygosity
in fruit flies in your textbook. In his experiment, what is predicted
about the evolution of eye color by a hypothesis that evolution occurs
only through genetic drift in his lab populations? What is predicted about
the evolution of eye color by a hypothesis that different genotypes differ
in fitness so that eye color evolves through natural selection? Which hypothesis
(evolution through genetic drift or evolution through natural selection)
is supported by Buri's experiments? How do the results of Buri's experiments
compare to the computer simulations of genetic drift that we are doing
in this class?
-
What is inbreeding? How is inbreeding related to genetic drift?
Why does inbreeding often result in offspring with low ability to survive
and/or reproduce?
-
You are comparing small populations of two different species of frog.
One has occurred in small populations throughout its evolutionary history.
The other historically occurred in larger populations, but because of recent
declines in numbers of amphibians resulting from excess exposure to ultraviolet
light, now occurs in small isolated populations in areas that are shaded
from light. Inbreeding occurs in both kinds of frog. In which
do you expect to see reduced survival of offspring resulting from inbreeding?
Why would you see this more in one species than in the other?
-
The population of sea otters on the west coast, historically a very large
population, underwent a sudden decrease in population size.
Population sizes stayed low for a number of generations, then gradually
increased. Now many of the sea otter populations are as large as
they were historically. (a) what is the term for this pattern of
population change? (b) During this period, what probably happened
to genetic variation? (c) How do you predict genetic variation in large
populations now to compare to genetic variation that was present in large
populations before the population decrease? Explain why.
-
One concern of biologists interested in conserving populations of endangered
species is that these species will lose genetic variation.
(a) Explain why these populations are predicted to lose genetic variation.
Which form of evolution is the main cause of this loss of variation?
Give two reasons why this kind of evolution is a problem, if your goal
is to conserve this species. (b) It has been suggested that a way to counteract
loss of genetic variation in such species is to allow individuals to move
among populations, or to move them among populations. What kind of
evolution would be occurring if individuals were moved among populations?
Why would it help counteract loss of genetic variation? Give one
reason why this kind of evolution might help the endangered population
AND one reason why this kind of evolution might hurt the endangered population.
(c) Suppose you have decided that you want to move individuals among populations
of a species to maintain variation. If you want to move just enough
individuals to prevent fixation of different alleles in different populations,
at what rate should individuals be moved?
-
What aspects of populations make local adaptation likely? What makes
local adaptation unlikely?
-
Three species of wren (little brown birds), Marsh Wrens, Sedge Wrens, and
Gray-breasted Wrens, differ in aspects of their population biology. Sedge
Wrens have very high rates of dispersal so that individuals from any area
are just as likely to reproduce with birds from very distant areas, nearby
areas, or the same area. Marsh Wrens live in intermediately sized populations
in marshes, are most likely to stay and reproduce in the marshes
where they were born, although a few individuals do disperse to distant
marshes each generation. Gray-breasted Wrens live in small populations
in isolated patches of their preferred habitat; they almost never disperse
away from the area where they were born. In which of these species (one
or more) would you expect high levels of local adaptation? In which would
you expect low levels of local adaptation? Explain your reasoning based
on what you would expect about within population and between population
genetic variation in these three species.
-
Chaffinches (little gray and pink birds) occur throughout Europe, in Northern
Africa, and on islands between Europe and Africa. Mainland populations
are typically very large; island populations are very small.The map below
shows several populations between which you have estimated gene flow.
-
Between which populations would you expect to see fixed differences in
allozymes? Why?
-
Between which populations would you expect to see most differences that
reflect adaptation to different local conditions? Why?
-
State something that might PREVENT high levels of local adaptation in each
of these populations?
-
You compare three species of aquatic snake: Lake Snakes occur in medium
sized populations and have dispersal of about 3 individuals between populations
each generation, Pond Snakes live in small populations in isolated ponds
and an average of only one individual every twelve generations disperses
from pond to pond, and Ocean Snakes live in large populations with very
high levels of dispersal from population to population. In which
of these snake species should there be the highest level of local adaptation
to the specific conditions in which a population occurs? Explain
why; consider the effects that gene flow, genetic drift, and natural selection
are likely to have on populations of EACH snake species to justify your
answer.
-
Read about the study of migration as a mechanism for evolution in the water
snakes of Lake Erie in Freeman and Herron (2001). If all evolution were
occurring through natural selection, what would snakes on islands and on
the mainland look like? Why? If all evolution were occurring
through gene flow what would snakes on islands and on the mainland look
like? Why? What is the actual appearance of the snakes in these different
areas? Explain the actual appearance of snakes in these different areas.
-
Read about the study of migration as a homoginizing evolutionary force
across populations of red bladder campion (a flowering plant) on in Freeman
and Herron (2001). Note that they study genetic variation among populations
-- that is, how different population are from each other genetically.
If gene flow were the only form of evolution occurring, what would be predicted
about genetic variation among populations? Why? If genetic drift were the
only form of evolution occurring, what would be predicted about genetic
variation among populations? Why? Giles and Goudet conduct their study
in an area in which the ages of populations are known. How are the
ages known? In this situation, the age of populations is predicted
to be related to the relative impacts of genetic drift and gene flow on
these populations. Why is this true? Do the results they observe
show the predicted effects of gene flow and genetic drift on genetic variation
among populations? Why/why not?
-
In a population of wild roses, at a locus that controls flower color, RR
individuals have red flowers, RW individuals have pink flowers, and WW
individuals have white flowers. You sample flowers from 80 individuals
and find the following numbers of phenotypes: 60 white, 15 pink, 5 red.
Conduct a chi-squared test to determine whether you are at least 95% sure
that genotypes differ from Hardy-Weinberg proportions. Given your
chi-squared results, which of the following could be occurring in your
population: natural selection, gene flow, genetic drift, mutation?
-
In a population of grasshoppers one gene has alternate alleles F and S.
You collect 80 individuals and use molecular techniques to identify the
alleles, and find:
| Genotype: |
FF |
FS |
SS |
| # Individuals with Genotype |
10 |
10 |
60 |
Use a chi-squared test to determine whether these genotypes are in Hardy-Weinberg
proportions. Based on your results, does it appear likely that natural
selection is affecting the this gene?
-
Tail length in a species of fish is controlled by a single locus: TT individuals
have long tails, tt individuals have short tails, and heterozygotes have
medium length tails. To test whether tail length is in Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium you randomly sample 100 fish from a population and find that
80 of them have long tails, 15 of them have medium tails, and 5 of them
have short tails.
-
What are the genotype frequencies for genotypes TT, Tt, and tt in this
fish population?
-
What are the expected genotype frequencies for genotypes TT, Tt and tt
if the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?
-
Determine whether the observed genotype frequencies differ significantly
from the frequencies expected in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at the 5% level
of significance.
-
Give one hypothesis that would explain why tail length could be in frequencies
other than Hardy-Weinberg (answer this question without considering whether
you found that the frequencies actually differ from Hardy-Weinberg or not).
-
You have collected tissue from 100 individual adult dogwood trees in a
population. You study an enzyme locus and find the following genotypes
(F and S refer to the two enzyme alleles):
| Genotype: |
FF |
FS |
SS |
| # Individuals with Genotype |
10 |
60 |
30 |
-
There seem to be a lot of heterozygotes in this population. Are there
significantly more than expected by chance, at the 5% level of significance
(i.e. are you at least 95% sure that there are more than are expected by
chance?)?
-
What evolutionary processes could result in such a distribution of genotypes?
-
A population of turtles varies in shell thickness: TT individuals have
thick shells, Tt individuals have intermediately thick shells, and tt individuals
have thin shells. You measure the shell thickness of 100 individuals
and find the following numbers of adult, reproducing individuals with each
shell type:
| Phenotype: |
Thick shells |
Intermediate Shells |
Thin Shells |
| # Individuals with Phenotype |
77 |
21 |
2 |
-
What is the frequency of the t allele in the population?
-
You hypothesize that thick-shelled turtles have the highest fitness because
they are best protected. To test this, conduct a chi-squared test to determine
whether or not shell thickness is in Hardy-Weinberg proportions at the
5% level of significance. What can you conclude about whether the population
is in Hardy-Weinberg proportions? Does this conclusion support your hypothesis
regarding the fitness of different shell thicknesses?