XII. MOLECULAR EVOLUTION: Phylogenetic analysis and
evolutionary processes (Information on molecular evolution relevant
to this section is in Freeman and Herron (2001) Chapter 18; information
on mutation that is relevant to this section is in Freeman and Herron Chapter
4. The lecture notes that provide information on these topics are
in the lectures on molecular
and morphological data in systematics and phylogenetic
analysis and molecular evolution)
Terms to know: neutral (with respect to selection), silent substitution,
morphology, DNA, convergent evolution, chance convergence, homology, saturation,
alignment, the fossil record, radiometric dating, molecular clock hypothesis,
the relative rates test.
Questions: phylogenetic analysis
-
Suppose you want to study phylogeny based on traits that are neutral with
respect to natural selection. (a) Why would you want to study neutral
traits to study phylogeny? (b) What parts of a DNA sequence
would you want to study? Why?
-
Consider two reconstructed phylogenetic trees of a group of closely related
fish. One is based on silent base-pair substitutions. The other
is based on mouth position and aspects of jaw structure and head shape
that are important functionally in how the fish eats. The two phylogenies
disagree with respect to the relationships among some of the fish species.
Which should be more reliable? Why?
-
Give advantages of using molecules such as DNA rather than morphological
characters for studying phylogenetic relationships. Give advantages
of using morphological characters rather than molecules for studying phylogenetic
relationships.
-
What is the significance of convergent evolution with respect to studying
phylogenetic relationships? Under what circumstances do you expect
morphological characteristics to show convergent evolution? Why?
Under what circumstances do you expect DNA sequence data to show convergent
evolution? Why? What form of DNA data have we discussed that is expected
to be phylogenetically informative and to have very little convergent evolution?
Why?
-
It has been argued that, in order to develop a well supported phylogeny,
one should study both morphological and molecular characters (not just
morphological or just molecular.) Explain why this is by explaining
one way in which studying morphological characters may result in a more
reliable phylogeny than studying molecular characters, and one way in which
studying molecular characters may result in a more reliable phylogeny than
studying morphological characters.
-
One major difficulty in the study of phylogeny is the existence of convergent
evolution. Explain what convergent evolution is and why it makes
it difficult to study phylogeny. Explain why convergent evolution
occurs in morphological data (data on the structure of organisms) and explain
or give examples of kinds of structures especially likely to show convergent
evolution. Explain why convergent evolution occurs in DNA sequences,
state where in the DNA sequence we are most likely to see convergence,
and explain why. Finally, explain why convergent evolution is expected
to be much lower in SINE/LINE data than either morphological data or DNA
sequence data.
-
When people first started using DNA data for phylogenetic analysis, they
expected that it would avoid a variety of problems observed in morphological
(structural) data. What are the problems DNA data was expected to
overcome. Does it really overcome these problems or does it still
have some or all of them? Explain.
-
What is alignment? Why is it important for DNA sequence based phylogenetic
analyses -- what error(s) might you make if you do not use it, and why?
-
Suppose that the following graph represents differences in DNA sequence
of a gene coding for the protein cytochrome-b between species whose speciation
dates have been determined from the fossil record.
-
What type of DNA would you use to study each of the following groups?
Explain why different types of DNA are more appropriate for different phylogenetic
studies in general, and why you choose the type you do for each specific
case. (a) Different subspecies of honeybee. (b) Relationships
among the three subphyla of the Chordata (tunicates, amphioxus, and vertebrates).
(c) Relationships within the fish family Salmonidae (includes trout and
salmon). (d) Relationships among the different phyla of worm
(flatworms, roundworms, segmented worms). (e) Species within
the bird genus Icterus (orioles)
-
DNA that evolves slowly is least likely to show chance convergence.
(a) Explain why this is likely to make variation in slowly evolving DNA
a particularly good indicator of phylogeny. (b) Given what
you discussed in (a), why would we ever want to use rapidly evolving DNA
to study phylogeny?
-
Why should the rate of neutral DNA evolution (per generation) be equal
to the mutation rate -- since it's neutral, and evolves through genetic
drift, and drift depends on the population size, why doesn't the rate of
neutral DNA evolution also depend on population size? (You need to
give an algebraic answer to this question).
-
Explain what is meant by the molecular clock, how it is calibrated, and
how it is used in phylogenetic reconstruction. Upon what assumption
is the molecular clock hypothesis based? How would you test to determine
whether this assumption is met?
-
You want to test a hypothesis that speciation between two species of ground
squirrel occurred as a result of the Pleistocene ice ages, about 1 million
years ago. You have a good fossil record that indicates that speciation
between a ground squirrel and a prairie dog occurred 5 million years ago.
You are studying a gene that has 70 DNA differences between the ground
squirrel and the prairie dog. Assuming the molecular clock
hypothesis applies to this gene, how many differences should there be between
the two ground squirrel species you're studying if your hypothesis about
the Pleistocene is correct? Show how you get your answer.
-
Assume that the following trees represent the true phylogenetic relationships
among the species. Each "tick" marks on the trees represents a molecular
change. Which one supports the molecular clock hypothesis?
Which does not? Why?

-
On the following phylogeny, if the molecular clock hypothesis is true,
which pairs of species should have the same number of DNA differences between
them?

-
What is the relative rates test? Draw a plausible phylogeny of three
species of your favorite group of organism, and state how you would apply
the relative rates test to this phylogeny.
-
Suppose you have developed a molecular phylogeny for a group of species
of clam. You would like to use the molecular clock to estimate the
times of speciation of the clam species, and you have a date of speciation
for two species from the fossil record. (a) explain how you would
use this information to determine the speciation dates of all the other
species. (b) explain how to use the relative rates test to determine
whether rates of evolution were constant, as is required for the molecular
clock hypothesis.
-
Discuss whether you would expect each of the following kinds of molecule
to evolve rapidly or slowly, and whether you would expect them to evolve
at a constant rate. Explain why you predict what you do. What is
the relevance of this information to the study of phylogeny? (a)
the sequence of amino acids in a peptide (protein) hormone. (b) the
base pairs in the third codon positions of a gene coding for a peptide
(protein) hormone. (c) the base pairs in the first codon positions
of a gene coding for a peptide (protein) hormone. (d) a region of
non-coding mitochondrial DNA. (e) DNA that codes for ribosomal RNA.
(f) DNA in an intron (a region in a gene whose information is ultimately
"spliced out" so it does not code for any amino acids) in a gene coding
for an important glycolytic enzyme. (g) DNA in an exon (a region
of a gene whose information does ultimately code for amino acids) in a
gene coding for an important glycolytic enzyme. (h) insertions of SINES
and LINES into specific genes
-
Describe one benefit and one problem for phylogenetic analysis with the
fact that mtDNA in vertebrates is non-recombining.
-
Suppose you want to study relationships among populations in a species
to test whether speciation is occurring. What form of DNA should
you use? Why?
Questions over the use of DNA to study evolutionary processes:
-
What are two possible kinds of mutations that could lead to the origin
of very different traits from those present in the ancestral species (more
different than expected for alternate alleles for a typical gene)
-
Explain how to distinguish between positive and negative selection on DNA
traits.
-
You are studying a group of deep sea animals that produce mating displays
by flashing bioluminescent (that is, biological pigments that produce light
so they can be seen in the darkness) colors. You have identified
the gene that codes for the enzyme needed for production of the main bioluminscent
pigment. You suspect that the active site of this enzyme has been
subject to positive selection to lead to the differences among species
in pigment that allow for species recognition. How would you test
this hypothesis? This enzyme is apparently a new trait, not present
in other related forms. How would such a new enzyme evolve,
and how could you test this hypothesis?
-
Based on a phylogenetic analysis, blue coloration in a group of butterflies
has evolved independently five times. Give two different possible
genetic bases for convergent evolution and explain how you would test between
them.
-
Explain how gene duplication can lead to each of the following, and explain
how you would test to see if it had occurred: (a) a new adaptive trait,
(b) a key innovation
-
What are three main features of Hox genes? Relate these main features
to: (a) the evolutionary origin of new Hox genes, and (b) the function
of Hox genes (c) the significance for further evolution of the evolution
of new Hox genes
-
What evidence suggests that Hox gene duplication and elaboration
was a key innovation?
-
Hypotheses of heterochrony were developed before people knew much about
the actual developmental mutations that might have occurred. How
does the more recent information on the genetics of development of the
tetrapod limb relate to these older hypotheses of heterochrony? What
kinds of mutation could cause heterochrony? In what kinds of genes
would they occur?
-
The initial pattern of development of lobe-finned fish lobes and tetrapod
limbs is dependent on the timing of expression of the same genes (including
Hox genes). Late in development, expression of Hox
genes in lobe-finned fish stops. In contrast, Hox genes are
expressed late in development in tetrapods; they regulate the development
of the hand. The tetrapod condition is apparently the derived condition.
Relate this description of the genetic regulation of development to hypotheses
of heterochrony. Does this suggest terminal addition or paedomorphosis?
Why?
-
What is "deep homology"? Use the Dll (distal-less) gene described
in Chapter 17 of Freeman and Herron (2001) as an example to explain what
this means.