XIX.LEVELS OF SELECTION, SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, AND ALTRUISM
(see Freeman and Herron (2001) Chapter 10 and lecture notes on levels
of selection)
Terms to know: species selection, group selection, individual
selection, kin selection , altruism, inclusive fitness, Hamilton's inequality,
b, r, c, haplodiploidy
Questions:
-
It is observed that females of a species of deer are physiologically capable
of having two offspring at a time, but that most females actually have
only one offspring at a time.
-
How could the difference between actual number of offspring and physiologically
possible number of offspring be explained through group selection?
-
How could the difference between the actual and physiologically possible
number of offspring be explained through natural selection at the individual
level?
-
Which explanation (group selection or individual selection) is more likely,
and why?
-
Given that the theory of group selection doesn't generally work, what is
the main contribution of Wynne-Edwards' book on group selection to the
field of evolutionary biology as a whole?
-
Some aspects of pathogens (organisms that cause diseases) have been hypothesized
to evolve through group selection. In what condition does this occur?
Why is group selection possible for this situation when it will not occur
in most situations.
-
The first sentence of section 16.1 in your textbook states that "altruism
is a central paradox of Darwinism." Later in the paragraph it is noted
that Darwin found the existence of altruism to be a "special difficulty,
which at first appeared to me insuperable, and actually fatal to my whole
theory." Why is altruism so hard to explain based on natural selection?
Altruism would seem to be beneficial to species containing altruists --
why does this NOT explain why altruism would evolve?
-
What is altruism? How was altruism proposed to evolve by group selection?
How was altruism proposed to evolve by kin selection? Which of these
forms of evolution (group selection or kin selection) is considered unlikely
to occur, and therefore an unlikely explanation for the evolution of altruism?
Why is this form of evolution considered unlikely?
-
Some sea anemones (animals in the phylum Cnidaria, related to corals and
jellyfish) reproduce asexually and live in colonies of genetically identical
individuals. It is observed that very little aggression occurs within
a colony, but individuals from different colonies are aggressive (they
sting each other with the stinging cells on their tentacles.) Give
a plausible evolutionary explanation for the difference in aggression within
and between colonies.
-
Explain why Hamilton's Formula, br-c>0, gives the conditions under which
altruism evolves. In your answer, fully explain what b, r, and c
represent and why each is important to understanding the evolution of altruism.
-
Why might haplodiploidy make the evolution of altruism more likely than
it would be in a diploid species?
-
Many plants have what are called inducible defenses -- they produce toxic
compounds in their leaves when their leaves are damaged as insects start
eating their leaves. This is thought to be an adaptation to save
energy -- they only produce the compounds when they are needed to prevent
herbivory. It has been suggested by the results of some studies that plants
may also give off chemicals that affect neighboring plants, so that when
insects have damaged one plant, other neighboring plants are signaled,
and also start producing toxic compounds. The neighbors are thus
better protected against insect damage. Assume that it is costly
for the original plant to produce the chemicals that warn the neighbors.
Would you expect to see chemicals that warn neighbors evolve more frequently
in species that reproduce clonally, and grow in stands of genetically identical
species, or in species that reproduce sexually and have their relatives
disperse far away from them? Why?
-
Explain how each of the following differences between two haplodiploid
wasp species would affect the likelihood of evolution of altruism by explaining
how each difference would affect one or more of the terms in Hamilton's
inequality (consider each difference separately from the others):
-
In one species, each female lays her eggs one at a time in very different
locations, while in the other species each females lays all her eggs together
in a nest.
-
In one species, developing larvae are fed on a scarce resource so that
a single individual can only find enough food to raise a small number of
offspring, while in the other species developing larvae are fed on an abundant
resource, easy to obtain in large quantities by a single individual.
-
In one species, each female mates with only one male, and then has many
offspring. In the other species each female mates with a large number
of males, and then has many offspring.
-
In one species, nests are subject to high levels of fungus infection so
that a single individual can only keep a few eggs fungus free (fungus infected
eggs die.) In the other species, there is little fungal infection
and single individuals can successfully raise many different eggs.
-
Define "inclusive fitness". Why may inclusive fitness be a better
indicator of whether a trait may evolve than relative fitness, based on
the number of surviving offspring of individuals, is.
-
A famous evolutionary biologist (J.B.S. Haldane) supposedly once said "I
would lay down my life for two brothers or eight cousins." Explain
the principle to which he was referring to when he said this, and explain
where the numbers "two" and "eight" in this statement come from.