Faculty Leave Proposal Evaluation Forms

This proposal is being evaluated on the following 5 point, Likert-type scale where 1 = "strongly disagrees" and 5 = "strongly agrees." Total points will receive an overall rating from 0-4. Individual proposal ratings are confidential. The rating sheets will be destroyed June 1.

_____ 1. The proposed activity will afford the applicant a significant renewal experience.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 2. The project goals are reasonable and clearly stated.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 3. The proposed activity is supported by and consistent with the potential implicit in the applicant=s vita.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 4. The project has potential for enhancement of professional recognition for both the applicant and
UT Martin.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 5. The proposal contains an appropriate statement of outcomes.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_______ Total Points (i.e., overall ratings of proposals are as follows):
0 = 5 pts., 1 = 6-10 pts., 2 = 11-15 pts., 3 = 16-20 pts., 4 = 21-25 pts.

4. Clearly an outstanding proposal: This proposal should be supported if at all possible.
3. A good proposal: This is an above-average proposal and should be supported, if possible.
2. An average proposal: This proposal certainly has merit, but it reflects no particularly remarkable characteristics which might warrant a higher rating.
1. A fair proposal: Parts of this proposal are good, but it is one for which you have substantial reservations.
0. A poor proposal: This proposal does not warrant consideration.

Proposal Number: ________ Evaluator Number: ________