Technology Program Proposal Evaluation

The Faculty Development Committee will evaluate your proposal using a 5 pt. Likert-type scale where 1 = "strongly disagrees" and 5 = "strongly agrees". Total points will receive overall ratings from 0-4. Individual proposal ratings are confidential. The rating sheets will be destroyed after the committee meets June 1.

_____ 1. The scope of the activity clearly indicates how the project will impact teaching.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 2. The purpose of the activity clearly indicates how the project will impact teaching.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 3. The evidence supports activity to be important to the applicant=s department/college.
1 = strongly disagree 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 4. The budget is reasonable in view of the proposed activity.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agree 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_____ 5. The evaluation of the use of technology in the classroom is clearly defined.
1 = strongly disagrees 2 = disagrees 3 = undecided 4 = agrees 5 = strongly agrees
Comments:

_________ Total Points (i.e., overall ratings of proposals are as follows):
0 = 0-5 pts., 1 = 6-10 pts., 2 = 11-15 pts., 3 = 16-20 pts., 4 = 21-25 pts.

4. Clearly an outstanding proposal: This proposal should be supported if at all possible.
3. A good proposal: This is an above-average proposal and one you would reluctantly see go unsupported.
2. An average proposal: This proposal certainly has merit, but it reflects no particularly remarkable characteristics which might warrant a higher rating.
1. A fair proposal: Parts of this proposal are good, but it is one for which there are substantial reservations.
0. A poor proposal: This proposal does not warrant consideration.

EVALUATOR NO. __________ PROPOSAL NO. ________