Top program sorted by number of primes
The Prover-Account Top 20 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Persons by: | number | score | normalized score |
Programs by: | number | score | normalized score |
Projects by: | number | score | normalized score |
At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.
Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding (log n)3 log log n for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.
Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.
rank program primes score 1 Jean Penné's LLR [special, plus, minus] 4825 56.5892 2 Geoffrey Reynolds' srsieve [sieve] 3225 55.5723 3 Reynolds and Brazier's PSieve [sieve] 2511 54.4506 4 David Underbakke's AthGFNSieve [sieve] 1227 54.8823 5 Yves Gallot's GeneFer [prp, special] 1218 54.8678 6 Anand Nair's GFNSvCUDA sieve [sieve] 1217 54.8682 7 LLR2 [other] 1110 54.7066 8 OpenPFGW (a.k.a. PrimeForm) [other, sieve, prp, special, plus, minus, classical] 411 52.3337 9 Marcel Martin's Primo [general] 307 46.6398 10 Paul Jobling's NewPGen [sieve] 270 51.4537 11 Pavel Atnashev's PRST [] 108 54.1112 12 CM a fast ECPP implementation Andreas Enge [general] 90 41.4273 13 EMsieve [sieve] 80 55.0551 14 George Woltman's Prime95 [special] 59 57.7004 15 Geoffrey Reynolds' gcwsieve [sieve] 58 53.8797 16 Yves Gallot's Proth.exe [other, special, plus, minus, classical] 57 51.4847 17 Yves Gallot's Cyclo [special] 51 54.9662 18 Anand Nair's CycloSvCUDA sieve [sieve] 49 55.0085 19 Robert Gerbicz's PolySieve [sieve] 48 48.8303 20 MultiSieve/mtsieve [sieve] 39 52.7136
Notes:
The list above show the programs that are used the most (either by number or score). In some ways this is useless because we are often comparing apples and oranges, that is why the comments in brackets attempt to say what each program does. See the help page for some explanation of these vague categories
- Number of primes
When counting primes we decided that if three people (persons) went together to find a prime, each should get credit for 1/3 of a prime. The same is true for projects, however programs get full credit for each prime (to encourage honest reporting of what programs where used). Persons, programs and projects are three separate categories and do not compete against each other.
For example, suppose the persons 'Carmody' and 'Caldwell' worked together and used the program 'PRP' to test candidates selected by the 'GFN 2^13 Sieving project', then completed their proofs using 'Proth.exe'. Then the persons 'Carmody' and 'Caldwell' would get 1/2 credit for each prime found; but the project 'GFN 2^13 Sieving project' and the programs 'PRP' and 'Proth.exe' would each get full credit.<\p>