Topology Atlas Conference Abstracts Document # caam-48.htm | Production Editor: J. Schommer

The 1997 Spring Topology
and
Dynamics Conference
April 10-12, 1997
Lafayette, Louisiana
Normality and metrizability in derived Moore spaces

by

G.M. Reed
(Oxford University )


In [On chain conditions in Moore spaces, General Topology and Its Applications 4 (1974), 255-267], the author gave constructions M(X) and M\infty(X) which produce Moore spaces for any regular, first countable T3 -space, where M represents a particular choice of countable local bases for each element of X . These constructions have since often been used by the author and others to answer open questions in the literature. In this paper the author considers conditions on X under which the two constructions are normal or metrizable. The results are surprising and provide answers to open questions on the productivity of normality in Moore spaces.

For example, it is shown that it is consistent with ZFC that there exists a normal, separable, locally compact Moore space X such that X2 is not normal. Recall that (1) (V=L) implies that normal locally compact Moore spaces are metrizable and (2) (MA) implies that normal, separable, locally compact Moore spaces have normal squares. It is also shown that it is consistent with ZFC and GCH that there exists a normal Moore space with a nonnormal square.

Examples of general theorems (where X is a regular, first countable T3 -space) include the following:

(1) (there exists a M . M(X) is normal) implies that each subset of X is a G\delta -set.

(2) (there exists a M . M(X) is metrizable) implies that X is a \sigma -discrete Moore space with a \sigma -disjoint base.

(3) There exists a \sigma -discrete Moore space X of cardinality \omega1 with a \sigma -disjoint base such that (for every M . M(X) is not normal).

(4) There exists a Moore space with M1 such that M1(X) is metrizable and M2 such that M2(X) is not normal, and it is consistent with ZFC that such a space exists which is also collectionwise Hausdorff.

(5) The following are equivalent:

(6) (b > \omega1 ) There exists a nonnormal X such that (for every M . M(X) is metrizable).

(7) (there exists a M . M\infty(X) is normal) implies that both M(X) and X are normal.

(8) If X is metrizable and each subset of X is a G\delta -set, there exists M such that M\infty(X) is normal.

(9) (|X| < b ) If X is normal, the following are equivalent:

(10) Under (V=L), if X is normal, (there exists a M . M(X) is normal) implies that X is \sigma -discrete and metrizable.

(11) It is consistent with ZFC that there exists a (non-\sigma -discrete) metrizable space X with each subset of X a G\delta -set such that:


Received by the editors: March 5, 1997.

Conference Archive | Conference Abstracts