I am asking you to critique a critical article or book chapter for three novels (three critiques, each over an article discussing a different novel).  Each review/critique should be approximately 600-750 words in length (2 pp., typed).  It should begin with identifying information (author, title, journal or book), then state the thesis of the article, briefly present the findings of the study, and provide a brief comment on the value of the essay.

Questions to Consider:

Is the thesis clear (it can be implied, but should still be evident)?
Does the writer adequately support the thesis?
What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses of the argument?
Does the writer resort to unexplored or unsubstantiated generalizations?
How readable is the essay?
How aware is the writer of other scholars who have contributed to the arguments he/she is making?
What is the critical approach being used in the analysis?

Do not be afraid to take issue with the writer of the piece--in fact, you may find that disagreeing with a critic is a way into a paper.  You might, for example, want to demonstrate what such a thesis might do for opening up a different novel (by the same author or on the same topic), or you might explore what was not considered (but remember, an article cannot consider every aspect--there must be a focus--thus a critic cannot be blamed for not considering everything).

If you have problems, email or come see me--but send the citation with the email or bring the article with you if you come to my office.