A revival of the land-grant mission?

Do you get the feeling we are on the verge of major changes in the United States? Our economy has reached at least the second worst point in its history, our two-party political system seems to need overhauling, public funds for running a massive nation are drying up with no promise of replenishment all while our infrastructure is crumbling, our education system is no longer the envy of the world and our healthcare system is perhaps the worst in terms of cost-effectiveness.

In my opinion, one thing needed is a rededication of institutions of higher education to the role of major resource in the communities in which they exist. The Morrill Act of 1862 created the original 106 land grant colleges, of which the University of Tennessee is one. I believe we need a new act stating that these and perhaps other institutions should be primarily focused on the betterment of the region and state, to provide knowledge in areas beyond just agriculture, to include social, psychological, nutritional, financial and other areas of practical understanding. As they currently exist, these institutions are too often considered irrelevant to the everyday problems that exist around them and for good reason, they often are.

Perhaps no universities are in a better situation to take on this assignment than ones with a regional mission such at the University of Tennessee – Martin.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A revival of the land-grant mission?

  1. Chuck says:

    Hi Mike,

    Thanks for this. I’ve often wondered about the fundamental mission of a “land-grant” university / college. Could you take a moment to elaborate on this point a bit?

    Also: in what ways are we, in your view, *not* “focused on the betterment of the region and the state”?

    To avoid any misunderstanding: my questions are intended to be facetious or sarcastic in any way. I am completely new to this and would like to learn more, even if it means asking very basic questions.

    • mike says:

      Chuck, you not facetious or sarcastic in any way (sounds like Woody Allen to me)…? In my view, the original mission of the land-grant system was to give the citizens something in return for the tax dollars they were paying for higher education in their state. More recently, I think many citizens of states may have a legitimate gripe if they say our tax dollars seem to pay university professors to talk among themselves and to teach students in a walled-off environment; students who afterwards are primarily interested in a career or making money for themselves but not so much concerned with taking up professions that help solve community problems or learn in an environment that helps them understand how to be compassionate members of any profession they do take up.