Definitions and References
The definitions for the various weakenings of realcompactness
will be presented by "class" -- the somewhat arbitrary classifications used
in the Topology Atlas.
A brief note about notation: this document was coded
with a proposed HTML math switch which browsers do not read quite
yet. Since the proposed codes are nearly identical to the
corresponding TeX-codes, perhaps this won't be such a big
problem. The lower- and upper-case Greek letters are pretty easy to spot, but
beginners might not recognize a few others:
| ∈ | element of |
| ∩ | intersect |
| ∪ | union |
| ⊂ | proper subset of |
| ⊆ | subset of |
| ≤ | less than or equal to |
| ∃ | there exist |
Throughout this summary we assume
to be Tychonoff, we let represent the
Stone-Cech compactification of , and we let
represent its
Hewitt-Nachbin realcompactification.
The citations provided are
not necessarily the original sources for the definitions.
A nice source for additional background information on realcompact spaces
is [W].
[GJ,5.15] is realcompact iff every ultrafilter of
zero-sets with the
countable intersection property is fixed.
[F] is almost realcompact iff every ultrafilter of
regular
closed sets with the countable intersection property is fixed.
[D] is a-realcompact iff every ultrafilter of closed
sets
with the countable intersection property is fixed.
Before we define pure spaces, we'll need the following:
A family of
non-empty subsets of a space is called an
interlacing on iff is
a cover of and for each , ,
is open in . An
interlacing is
-suspended from a family
of subsets of a space iff for
arbitrary , , there exists a countable subcollection of
such that is empty.
[A] A space is called pure iff for each free
closed ultrafilter on , there is an
interlacing which is -suspended from
.
Before we define neat spaces, we'll need a bit of notation.
For an ultrafilter , and
is empty}.
[Sak] A space is called neat iff for every free
closed ultrafilter with the countable
intersection property on , there is a system
with such that
- and
,
- for each , is an open collection in and
,
- each mapping to is such that if
and
is injective, then
,
- for each and ,
such that is empty.
[Mil] A space is called -neat
iff for every free
closed ultrafilter with the countable
intersection property on , there is a system
with such that
- ,
- for each , is an open collection in and
,
- each mapping to is such that if
and
is injective, then
,
- for each and ,
such that is empty.
[Mro] is realcompact iff for each point , there
exists a
continuous function on such that
and is positive on .
[D] is c-realcompact iff for each point , there
exists a
normal lower semicontinuous function on
such that
and is positive on .
[SS] is p-realcompact iff every zero-set of
that meets meets
.
If represents the collection of
continuous functions with realcompact support, then
is realcompact iff
.
For any set , let
MA = and OA =
.
Let
denote the ring of
continuous functions with compact support,
the ring of
functions with pseudocompact support, and the intersection
of all
free maximal ideals of . Then
[M] is
-compact iff .
[M] is -compact iff
.
[JM] is -compact iff
.
[BS] is -compact iff
O =
M
[Shi][GJ,15.20] is realcompact iff
admits a compatible
complete uniformity and contains no
closed discrete subspace of measurable cardinality.
[E,8.5.13] We call a space completely
uniformizable (or Dieudonne complete or topologically
complete) iff it admits a compatible complete uniformity.
[Bac][BLS,3.9] A space is said to be hyperisocompact
[strongly isocompact] (isocompact)
iff every relatively pseudocompact [strongly relatively
pseudocompact] (countably compact) closed subset
is compact.
[GJ,8.5] is realcompact iff .
[BvD] is nearly realcompact iff
is dense in .
[GP,14.3] is realcompact iff each 2-valued Baire measure in
is
-additive.
[GP,8.1] A space is called weakly Borel-complete iff each
2-valued Borel measure in is weakly -additive.
[GP,8.1] is closed-complete
(or -realcompact)
iff each 2-valued
regular Borel measure in is -additive.
References
[A] A. V. Archangel'skii, The Star Method, new classes of
spaces and countable compactness, Soviet Math Dokl, 21,7 (1980),
550-554.
[Bac] P.Bacon, The compactness of countably compact
spaces, Pacific J. Math., 32 (1970), 587-592.
[BvD] R.L. Blair and E. van Douwen, Nearly Realcompact
Spaces, Top. Appl. 47,3 (1992), 209-221.
[BLS] R.L. Blair and M.A. Swardson, Spaces with an Oz
Stone-Cech Compactification, Top. Appl., 36 (1990), 73-92.
[BS] I.Blum and S.Swaminathan, A note on intersections
of ideals in rings of continuous functions, in "Topology",
Coloquia Mathematica Societatis Janos Bolyai 23 Vol I, North
Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, pp.155-162.
[D] N. Dykes, Generalizations of Realcompact Spaces,
Pacific J. Math. 33 (1970), 571-581.
[E] R. Engelking, "General Topology," Heldermann Verlag,
Berlin, 1989.
[F] Z. Frolik, A generalization of realcompact spaces,
Czech. Math. J., 13 (1963), 127-138.
[GP] R.J.Gardner and W.F.Pfeffer, Borel Measures, in
"Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology", Elsevier, 1984, 961-1043.
[GJ] L.Gillman and M.Jerison, "Rings of Continuous Functions",
University Series in Higher Math, Van Nostrand, Princeton New Jersey, 1960.
[JM] D.Johnson and M.Mandelker, Functions with
pseudocompact support, Gen. Top. Appl., 3 (1973), 331-338.
[M] M.Mandelker, Supports of Continuous Functions,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 156 (1971), 73-83.
[Mil] E.S.Miller, Closed Preimages of Certain
Isocompactness Properties, Top. Proc., 13 (1988), 107-123.
[Mro] S.Mrowka, Some properties of Q-spaces, Bull.
Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys., 5
(1957), 947-950.
[Sak] M.Sakai, A new class of isocompact spaces and
related results, Pacific J. Math., 122,1 (1986), 211-221.
[Shi] T. Shirota, A class of topological spaces, Osaka
Math. J., 4 (1952), 23-40.
[SS] M.A.Swardson and P.J.Szeptycki, When
is a space, Canadian
Bulletin, to appear.
[W] M. Weir, "Hewitt-Nachbin Spaces," North Holland Math.
Studies, American Elsevier, New York, 1975.
Last modified January 25, 1996