Shakespeare’s Lost Sonnets: A Restoration
of the Runes An Index to the First Lines of the Runes |
![]() |
This index may be useful because readers in time may come to recall some runic numbers by their first lines. Collectively, these are the 155 lines comprising the 11 sonnets that initiate the sets. (The number is 155, not 154, because Sonnet 99, initial in Set VIII, has 15 lines, not 14— triggering aberrational A and B variants in that set, and different openings for Runes 99A and 99B.) Locating all of his runic openers inside just 11 overt texts laid a particular set of constraints on the poet—also otherwise much constrained, of course—and had predictable effects on both the cycles that Q houses: The lines of the first sonnet in each set, even the interior lines, were all under pressure to say something that would admit development into a new train of thought; but if all 14 of a first-sonnet’s lines sounded like opening pronouncements or separate lead-ins, that sonnet text would suffer choppy disconnection and might seem to disintegrate. A main upshot of this tension, I think, is that the Runes often open as if in medias raes—compounding their riddlic features. Comparing the runic line-openings with the first lines in the Sonnets (cf. Booth’s first-line index, pp. 574ff.) shows, e.g., that the Runes are much more likely than the Sonnets to open with coordinating conjunctions that imply logical continuation, especially “And…,” “But…,” “For…,” “Nor…,” and “Yet….” (“Nor,” reversed, puns on “rune.”) One rune even opens with “Therefore….” This pattern of first lines that seem to start halfway around the track rather than at the starting line allies in the Runes with the many pre-positioned pronouns and implicit but unstated subjects—features that seem to emerge from the same set of necessary technical constraints at work in Q. In summary, then, the Sonnets typically open with clearer and more straightforward assertions than the Runes do. Notably, few runes start with “O…,” the most common rhetorical opener in the Sonnets. (Perhaps loading up the first-sonnet texts in the sets with “O’s”—as Will, e.g., loads up Runes 61, 69, and 79—would’ve created an excessive kind of overt bathos.) Too, the Sonnets are much more apt than the Runes to start with “How…,” an opener that may effectively trigger either a question to explore or an assertion to pursue. Openings with “When…” seem almost equally popular in both of Q’s linked genres. Technicalities of the Megasonnet scheme dictate that most of the lines in Q that are already familiar as first-line titles for sonnets are not equally salient in their runic locales. The 11 initial lines in the sets are the only ones that, in a given case, can concurrently initiate both a sonnet and a rune. A few of these 11 lines ring familiar—including “When in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes” (Sonnet 29.1, Rune 29.1)—but most do not. Because Sonnet 29 is so well known, all 14 runes that its lines engender seem to begin their race for public recognition with a leg up. The items below appear as regularized and edited first-line component of runes. In a few cases, the first word of an edited line is a pun on the Q form (e.g., “Whore…” as a pun on Q’s “Or…”), so that that pun displaces the line in an alphabetized sequence. In such cases, I’ve entered that line twice, using both the overt and the punning forms of the opening line element, to help readers locate it. A few edited first-lines from Set VIII show small variations in their A and the B contexts; here I select the edited form that goes with the rune number that’s listed first in sequence below—all B variants, as it happens. |
|